Thursday, July 16, 2020

Continuity of Civilization

 
It's even worse than we think! Here, an ageing Russian tries to warn us:
 
 
Years from year of 2028 to year 2032 are non-planting years if you have forgotten this discussion with Inventor Lee Wheelbarger 51:19 to 52:01 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJHVp9wcq3E Non-planting years. That is 8 years from now of 2020. You Americans have 8 years to terraform and treat your farmlands, overplant and overproduce. harvest the crops, preserve the crops indefinitely, store the crops, stockpile the crops, protect the stockpiled stored crops for the 4 years of non-planting period. AND NO AGRICULTURAL EXPORTS ALLOWED AT ALL! Your American government has to do this if it wants America to survive as the America that you know today! According to a book printed in the 1980s the typical cassava yields in several Southeast Asian countries you can get an unbelievable 50 to 70 tons of cassava per hectare. It may not provide protein in it's roots, but the calories it provides at least save the body from burning up protein it does consume, which happens when people don't get enough calories. Cssava's leaves - often discarded or fed to animals - are edible and cintsin protein, vitamins and minerals. It's final virtue is that it nees very little fertilizer to do well. Source book: THE THIRD WORLD TOMORROW. A report from the battle in the world aganist poverty. Author: Paul Harrison Second Edition Page: 97 First published 1980. Reprinted 1981. Second edition 1983. Microfilmed and photocopied on archival microfilm and on archival paper using archival ink in 1983 Moscow, Continuity Of Civilization Archivalization Department. One consider the several factors that can be of help such as: 1. Rock dust powders that can increase yields by 4 to 5 times. 2. Biochar that can increase yields by 880% or 8.8 times. 3. Nitrogen-fixing perennial living mulch that can increase yields by 4 times. 4. Mychorrizal fungi innoculaants that can increase yields by 4 times. 5. Iron oxide rock dust powders of which 1 kilogram can produce 100,000 kilograms of phytoplankton. One can only imagine what effect it will have on land plants if applied properly and it seems no one seems to have done any experimentation on it. Just in case somebody tries to experiment on it, do not use taconite iron rock ore for it contains elements similar to asbestos. The best iron ore is found in Utah and is currently mined by Palladon’s Iron Mountain Project, Utah. The iron ore is magnetite and might be considered safe for use. But your American government must stop it from exporting it's iron ore to China as part of America's sanctions against China and use it for domestic use only, especially if and when someone tried to do some experimenting in using it as part of the rock dust remineralization ' experiment in a small scale first. The addition of iron ore rock dust powder might require the addition of limestone rock dust powders and gypsum rock dust powders to neutralize whatever elements it might have but it will require careful analysis of the magnetite ore found in Utah to see if it contains some or any detrimental elements that might affect plant life. You Americans can do that, not I since you are in America and I am in Kazan, Russia. https://www.srk.com/en/publications/palladons-iron-mountain-project-utah 53:09 to 54:31 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XR3Wfo0evp0&t=540s Can we grow enough food for everybody in America? The answer is yes. But one must keep in mind that it will require an "ADJUNCT FOOD PRODUCTION SYSTEM USING EDIBLE MICRO-ALGAE" and the scientific statement made by one scientist who said that 1 kilogram of soluble iron oxide dust powder can produce 100,000 kilograms of phytoplankton can also be used, theoretically, to produce 100,000 kilograms of edible chlorella micro-algae and-or 100,000 kilograms of edible spirulina micro-algae. If my great-granduncle (Darthvader5300) is here right now he will also be asking the same question which is, why is it no one is bothering to experiment with it? What are they waiting for? Ironic isn't it? Quite ironic indeed!

No comments:

Post a Comment